Which One Is Better: Macroeconomics Or Microeconomics?

Both macro and micro are crucial, and either is important in validating and calibrating the other. The crux is what you define as macro.

There is a hierarchical relationship between macro and micro. Both are crucial, and either is important in validating and calibrating the other. Micro is a downstream implementation derived from macro, and a new implementation of macro is born out of the finite iterations of micro.

The way to look at the relationship between the two I cover in the evolution of evolution, which attempts to describe the relativity of all evolutionary processes.

The problem with either today is that they are based on a voodoo religion of economics, in which macro is really micro on an evolutionary scale, and thus fails to attach to the values the evolution of mankind depends upon.

 

Bookmark article

The sign of a vibrant, innovative nation is its willingness to pursue the ever-unfolding discovery of nature's truth and reinvent itself continually against those proven new normalizations upstream. Let’s inspire the world with new rigors of excellence we first and successfully apply to ourselves.

Click to access the login or register cheese